The Family Game (1983)

Hassan Shreif
4 min readJan 29, 2021
Japanese poster of the film.
Japanese poster of the film.

On the surface level, this story is quite simple; a Japanese family with two kids; one of the kids is having trouble at school with his low grades, and so his parents hire a tutor, and that is indeed what happens here; but it’s so much more than that.

A very “flat” shot of the family having dinner with the tutor.

Director Yoshimitsu Morita always starts with the familiar and then shifts and changes it just enough to keep us going. Small details are what matter here. The cinematography is rooted in the Japanese tradition, long still takes and a very flat look, but again, that’s not all. Small changes in the shots of the same subject keep everything fresh.

Another important technical aspect is the use of sound. The film doesn’t have any songs, but at the same time, music plays a role in the narrative. We see characters listening to music, but we hear nothing but silence. In a number of scenes, the sound is drowned out and completely muted.

On one level, this is a social critique of Japanese society at the time and the role of the family in it, and being a comedy, it is also satirical in its critique. On another level, this is very much a meta commentary on the medium of cinema and art in general.
The main focus here is the younger brother, Shigeyuki (Ichirôta Miyakawa), and his relationship with his new tutor, Yoshimoto (Yûsaku Matsuda). The coming of this teacher disrupts the order of the family. He’s an outsider, almost an alien. We know nothing of his background except the fact that he has a girlfriend and went to a normal university.

The tutor Yashimoto arriving on a boat, as if from another land.

One cannot help but notice the similarities between this character and that of the protagonist of Pier Paolo Pasolini’s “Teorema (1968).” In both films, the outsider comes and changes something, and in both films this alien-like person introduces an element of eroticism. Yashimoto is often seen breaking the societal rules of Japanese society, always getting up in the faces of others and shaking everyone’s hand (something rare in Japan).

Yashimoto making Mr. Numata socially and sexually uncomfortable.

Food is also another one of those elements that are there playing a silent role. For most of us lucky ones, food is a daily routine and we almost always take it for granted. The same goes for the character of the father, Mr. Numata (played by Jûzô Itami, who is also the director of a number of highly acclaimed films such as “Tampopo (1985)” and “Osôshiki (1984)”). Mr. Numata always expects the same breakfast, his eggs the way he likes them, until something small changes in how his wife prepares his eggs and makes him question everything. Again, there’s that theme of repetition, of the daily routine down to the smallest detail that we take for granted.
The same phenomenon is seen in the camera movements and in the sound until something changes (e.g., silence when we expect music). This is also an exploration of capitalism in Japan during the 80s and how it affected people, turning them into machines.
Such a film is not simply a mirror of society, instead it’s more like The Matrix (1999), where we conduct a simulation. What we see is a simulation of a family, not a real one.

A hockey videogame on TV and a “real” mini hockey game with lights around it resembling a film set.

Mr. Numata goes inside his parked car and starts it without ever moving. Shigeyuki has his miniature games of a rollercoaster and a miniature hockey game, and we have this film. This experiment is the director’s exploration of meaninglessness in life, and each of the characters are involved in that search. The mother questions her role in the household and looks back on the past, the kids question their choices of high school and their future careers.
There are countless themes to be explored here, from sexuality to our role towards society and towards each other. The comedy here might feel a bit outdated, but other than that, this is a masterful film in all other departments, and it is a very important film. It feels like it’s a transitional work, taking us from one era to the next. It doesn’t revolutionize the game or try to reinvent the wheel because it knows that’s not possible. From time to time, a little chaos slips into our daily routine and minutely changes our personal lives, and the same goes for humanity as a whole. Each day there’s a sunrise, and each sunrise is different. While some things change, life always goes on.

--

--

Hassan Shreif

A cinephile documenting my journey through cinema and hoping to get more people aboard by sharing my thoughts on lesser known films.